Another article on the Social Security Tribunal.

http://news.google.com/news/url?sr=1&sa=t&ct2=ca%2F0_0_s_2_0_t&usg=AFQjCNGDF5A0bsmios3M05wo9b0kYpm8YA&did=33d65350e1c72008&cid=52778589824792&ei=DnD2U5DrILD98AHs5oCYCw&rt=STORY&vm=STANDARD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.winnipegfreepress.com%2Fcanada%2Fbacklogged-social-security-panel-stops-tracking-results-kenney-oks-more-staff-272165011.html

 

Here is another article written by Lee Anne Goodman of The Canadian Press.  Although the headline reads that the Social Security Tribunal is allowing more appeals - please note that the actual results are these:   Out of the 933 appeals that have been allowed - 775 were reversal of prior denials made by Canada Pension Plan ( in another words CPP disability overturned their decision to deny)  and  ONLY 158 were actual  decisions allowed by the Social Security Tribunal.

Of the 303 denials that were made by the Social Security Tribunal - 107 of these were Summarily Dismissed and 196 were denials as a result of appeals.

According to the documents that I have received under Access to Information - the tribunal held 465 tribunals since the inception.  The documents that state they "do not track" the results are sitting here next to me in my office.

Please people - it is time to speak out.  I know there are so many who call me and email me who are afraid to speak out for fear that it will hurt their appeal - and I understand that - but this has to change.  What has happened to good Canadian people is an absolute disgrace.  How can this government get away with treating hard-working tax paying Canadians like this?  Please speak out and put a face to these numbers.

Today I got an appeal date for a lady.  She does not speak English.  She has been offered a teleconference appeal.  She has been waiting since January 2012.  Really - even with an interpretor how is that fair?

AGAIN I just want to reiterate that I do not have any "beef" with the staff who work at the Social Security Tribunal. They are working hard I know this - and trying to move these deadlines.

 

I wonder what will happen tomorrow?  Stay tuned.

 

CPP Disability Benefit Time Lines

I have had several messages concerning the time lines at Canada Pension Plan.  I am not talking about the horrendus delays at the Social Security Tribunal, but rather the adjudication and processing times at Canada Pension Plan disability. 

These timelines are for adjudication on initial applications as well as time lines for adjudication on reconsideration appeals.

I confirmed with Service Canada today that the time lines are 26 weeks.  That means it is taking over six months for a decision on a CPP disability application or appeal.

 

Okay so I know from the Freedom of Information requests that I have made that the denial rate on initial is around 62%.  That means that it is going to take over six months for 6 out of 10 of you to be told that you are denied.  And of those people who go on to appeal, it is going to take another six months before you receive a decision on the appeal - and if you are denied again  - well then you are at the Social Security Tribunal.

From the information that I have read and have here in my office, there is a memorandum that notes that the Social Security Tribunal does not expect to be able to manage this backlog until 2017.  In fact I quote from a Memorandum to the Minister of Employment and Social Development from the Social Security Tribunal dated February 2014 states "Based on the early assumptions, the transferred inventory and newly acquired inventory (the backlog) would be eliminated at the earliest by 2017."

So there you go folks.   Please get help with your applications and your reconsideration appeals.  This is no joke. 

Please contact the office if you need help.

Madam Commissioner - Social Security Tribunal - I need answers to my emails

Perhaps there should be an investigation in to why there is no Information being received from the General Information Email that I am continually being told to use by civil servants and the Social Security Tribunal.  I think that I should bring to attention the fact that it is very challenging to prepare for appeals in an adequate way when I do not get information that is needed for these people.

I am told that this is the appropriate email to use in order to get information on upcoming appeals.

Well speaking to my last email I still have not got responses on these requests.

Further, I have an appeal coming up on August 7th, 2014.

I sent an email - marked it urgent - about the information that I have not received from the Social Security Tribunal which is needed so that the client and our representative can prepare for the appeal.

Okay so we have 18 days until the hearing - when will my emails be returned?

I cannot believe this - this would never happen at the old appeal bodies - why is it so darn difficult for this Tribunal to get it together.

Will the heaing be adjourned because the information was not received in a timely manner????????

 

Recent news articles Social Security Tribunal

With the recent newspaper articles that have been appearing in the national media over the last several weeks, you would think the Social Security Tribunal would be stepping up it's game.

Apparently this is not the case - I am wondering if a story could be written that could talk about the lack of information offered by this agency to the people who have to try and navigate the system.

I have been receiving a lot of calls lately - asking me questions because it will take three days for a client to get an answer from the Social Security Tribunal - and these phonecalls also include request for information on what they should do from MPs offices.

Most recently, I had asked to receive information on an appeal via email to a specific civil servant and was kindly told to email the general information line again.

I did that - and marked it urgent - the appeal is on August 7th.  To date I still have not got a response to my request for information.  In the end, I had to get the answer to my question from the department.

I have also sent two other emails on a file over the last month and I have not got a response - this client's file has an issue that I am trying to resolve - and yet I have had no response.

The last newspaper article written by Dr. Michael Prince has been shared over 1000 times - thank you.

 

 

Seven reasons why disabled Canadian are losing CPP disability benefits

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/seven-reasons-why-disabled-canadians-are-losing-cpp-benefits/article19630200/

 

Here is another article in the Globe and Mail written by Michael Prince.

It provides the seven reasons why disabled Canadians are losing their CPP disability benefits. 

I have written about all seven reasons on this blog - not as eloquently as Mr. Prince.

Please get help whether you are applying for or appealing the denial of your CPP disability benefit.  If you have been denied at intial and you are in the reconsideration process, it is critically important that you get help preparing your appeal.  You do not want to be stuck in the Social Security Tribunal - for all the reaons that Mr. Prince writes in his article.

Please share this article with all your networks.  I will spend the next hours here in the office doing so.

 

Fewer claimants successful when appealing disability benefit denials.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/fewer-claimants-successful-when-appealing-disability-benefit-denials/article19501881/

 

Another article ran in the Globe and Mail today.  Again please share this with your networks. I am pleased to say that yesterday's story was shared by over 4000 people.  Thank you.

I think the most critical statistic in this article is that in 2013-2014 (since the inception of the Social Security Tribunal) that only 43% of the appeals have been successful.

I have my thoughts on why this is the case, and you can find those if you take the time to read through the blogs that I have been posted since March 2012.

I am afraid we all have to deal with the reality of this new system.  In the next several weeks I will start to repost blog entries to try to give ideas and suggestions to those people who find themself in this system.  Let's all go through the regulations together and the CPP disability adjudication guidelines.

I cannot stress enough that you need to be prepared for these appeals.  It would be my preference for clients not to get to this stage and like one reader commented - if the Feds did not deny 60% of cases originally and reviewed appeals and applications applying their own adjudication guidelines  - then maybe the statistics would be different.

Please get help with your applications and your reconsiderations.  You do not want to have to be stuck at this new appeal system.  Based on these numbers, you will not have a good chance at success.

 

Social Security Tribunal - Some answers please?

The Globe and Mail story has been shared 1390 times since it appeared online at 9.00pm last night.

I would like to make the following comments on the article:

Mr. Sapp's comments stating that he could not have made fair decisions without meeting claimant face to face clearly illustrates why the Canada Pension Plan Act had previously allowed for in-person hearings. A client has already been denied two times by the Canada Pension Plan adjudicators before they had the opportunity to appear before an adjudication body in person.  According to statistics obtained from the Ministry - the prior appeal system overturned 59.96% of the CPP denials in 2005, 58.67% of the denials in 2006, 57.99% of the decisions in 2007, 52.04% of the denials in 2008, 53.75% of the denials in 2009, 52.24% in 2010, and 49.44% of the appeals in 2011 -2012.

You can see how these figures highlight that according to the arm-lengths appeal body - the CPP disability adjudicators had the decision wrong 50% of the time.  This number also does not take in to account, the individuals who gave up because they thought their appeals would go nowhere, as well as those who believed that the government must have made the right decision.  Further, these statistics do not illustrate how many of the 50% that were denied at the Review Tribunal appealed to the Pension Appeals Board and had the denial reversed.

The article also mentions that there was a backlog of around 10,000 appeals.  As I indicated in a prior blog entry, the Social Security Tribunal have already accumulated another 2000 appeals this year already - so does this mean we are now around 12,000 backlogged appeals.

Dominique Forget's comments leave much to be desired.  There is no explanation about the reasoning behind the decision to make a decision based only on the written documents - she says it is for "flexibility and efficiency" - perhaps the SST have been instructed to move the files - and this is their answer?  Again my thoughts have always been that it is really easy to "rubber stamp" a denial on a while when you do not get to meet the Appellant and hear their subjective experiences.  Mr. Sapp had that right.  The Director of the SST notes that they are "trying to move files as quick as they can."  Move the files where?  In to another level of appeal - in to the courts when Appellants say they have been denied the right to have their cases heard?  Up to the Supreme Court of  Canada  like Mr. Villanin (for those who do not know, Mr. Villani changed the landscape for Appellants). 

How about the Director of the Social Security Tribunal contact the bureacrats and tell them that their dismantling of the prior appeal system without obviously any regard to the consequences is not working to well and that they should rethink what they have done here.

It would not be so worrisome if an Appellant was told that the Social Security Tribunal member felt on the documents provided that their decision would be to grant and appeal and bounce it back to the Minister for their submissions. But these clients have no idea what is going to happen and this is too important a matter to be left to the unilateral decision of a Tribunal Member to decide.  The converse could also work.  If a Tribunal Member advised that they were leaning towards a denial and wrote their reasons why they felt that way, then the Appellant would have an opportunity to sway them or to present more information - or at least have the opportunity to be HEARD - that is what I think these people at the Social Security Tribunal do not understand - the Appellants want to be HEARD and most of them have waited years for this opportunity.

I think the Director's comments about the Tribunal not keep statistics to show the relative success of appellant who are able to present their case in person versus those who are not is a bit of baloney.  In February this year, I received information from the Freedom of Information office which gave me these numbers - they are posted on the blog.  So what has happened in the last three months - all of a sudden the Social Security Tribunal are not keeping records?

The totality of the comments that I submitted to the Globe and Mail are as follows:

"It appears that the way the Social Security Tribunal is going to manage the enourmous accumulation of backlogged appeals is to unilaterally deny Canadians the right to be heard in an in-person hearing.  It is not the function of the Tribunal to "rubber stamp" only medical opinions.  The CPP disability adjudicaton process must include a review of the totality of the written information, as well as the subjective experiences of the Appellant.  This can only be achieved by holding an in-person hearing.  By denying this right to this type of appeal, the Federal Government has found another way to tile the playing field in their favour."


The rules of natural justice say that you are entilted to a hearing if their is some value in having it says Mr. Fink.  The value in having a hearing is clear.  The Tribunal should not be denying the right to in-person appeals. 

Please keep sharing this article.